- Bot Hurt
- Posts
- AI didn’t overwhelm you. You did.
AI didn’t overwhelm you. You did.
AI didn’t create the stall. It just made it easier to stay there.
Don’t get bot hurt. Get bot even.

When people say AI feels overwhelming, they’re usually describing a very specific sensation. Not panic. Not confusion. Something quieter. Something familiar.
It’s the feeling of having too many things open at once.
Drafts that are almost done. Options that might be useful later. Versions you don’t want to delete because they represent futures you’re not ready to kill.
Nothing is broken. Nothing is urgent. Nothing is chosen.
We call that overwhelm because it sounds external. Like something happened to us. But what’s really happening is simpler.
You haven’t decided yet.
There’s a name for this pattern: decision avoidance.
The habit we don’t name
Instead of choosing, we keep things alive.
We revise instead of committing. We save instead of sending. We ask for one more version — not because the work needs it, but because choosing would mean closing a door.
Calling it “being thoughtful” feels better than calling it what it is: delay with better branding.

Why AI makes this easier
AI is very good at supporting this habit.
Not because it’s dangerous. Not because it’s manipulative. But because it’s endlessly agreeable. A bot will never tell you to stop. It won’t sigh. It won’t ask why you’re still here.
It will happily generate more options. Cleaner rewrites. Subtler tones. One more take, then another. If your goal is to keep every door open, AI will hold them for you all day.
This isn’t a bug. It’s excellent customer service.
How the stall shows up
You’ve seen this before, probably this week.
A “quick tweak” becomes a pile of drafts. A clear next step turns into a folder called final_v7. The work itself is fine. Solid, even.
It just never leaves the building.
We’ve seen this before
We saw the same pattern in Bots on the Job Hunt.
The problem wasn’t AI helping people apply. It was the attempt to keep every possible future version of yourself alive at once — strategic, creative, safe, ambitious, all competing for attention.
Without a choice, momentum never shows up. Energy goes into maintaining options instead of moving forward. That’s when things start to feel heavy.
The shift
Choosing feels risky because it closes doors. Keeping everything open feels safer — briefly.
Over time, that safety turns into drag.
So here’s the shift to try this week.
Before you open a bot, decide what you’re trying to close.
One draft.
One decision.
One direction.
When it’s good enough, stop. Pick it. Ship it. Archive the rest — without pretending you’ll come back later.
AI doesn’t need better prompts. It needs a human willing to choose.
Final Bot Thought
Overwhelm is what indecision feels like after it’s been running too long.
Bot Talk: Slop won the year
The humans behind the dictionary named slop the word of the year.
Slop winning the year says less about AI quality and more about what happens when creation outpaces choice. The gap between “can be made” and “should be shared” quietly disappeared.
If this feels familiar, it should. Bot Hurt has flagged the slop problem before — twice — because it keeps resurfacing as the default outcome of scale. Feed slop. Retail slop. Corporate slop that looks polished but feels empty.
Slop may have won the year, but taste decides what lasts.
Coming up next week…
AI didn’t kill your confidence. It exposed it.
What happens when the draft is instant, the options are endless, and judgment is the only thing left to do.
Don’t get bot hurt. Get bot even.